www.padrak.com/theterrorconspiracy/

January 28, 2007


THE TERROR CONSPIRACY

Deception, 9/11, and the Loss of Liberty

By Jim Marrs

Published by The Disinformation Company Ltd.
163 Third Avenue, Suite 108
New York, NY 10003
Tel.: +1.212.691.1605
Fax.: +1.212.691.1606
www.disinfo.com
Copyright 2006 Jim Marrs

Order this book at: www.cafepress.com/disinfo/


See also the summary of the previous shorter version of this book;

With the author's heartfelt and honest title:

Inside Job - Unmasking the 9/11 Conspiracies

At www.padrak.com/insidejob/


Summary Contents Below:

Table of Contents
Introduction
Front Cover
Back Cover with Text

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ............................................. IX

PART I - THE EVENTS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ................. 1
A Chronology Of Events .................................... 2
Unresolved Questions Abound ............................... 6
What Did President Bush Know, And When? .................. 11
Did War Games Aid The Terrorists? ........................ 13
Who Authorized 'I he Bin Laden Evacuation? ............... 19
What About The Hijackers Themselves? ..................... 20
What Really Happened At The Pentagon? .................... 30
Explosions At The World Trade Center ..................... 39
Firefighters Thought The Fires Were Controllable ......... 51
What Caused The Collapse Of WIT. Building 7? ............. 60
FEMA's Report: Cause Of WTC Collapses Unknown ............ 62
Tracks Of Foreknowledge .................................. 70
The FBI Couldn't, Or Wouldn't, Connect The Dots .......... 84
Missed Opportunities At The CIA ......................... 101
Selling Stocks Short Indicates Foreknowledge ............ 112
What About Israeli Foreknowledge? ....................... 120
Were The Hijacked Planes Remotely Controlled? ........... 134

What Really Happened To Flight 93? ...................... 141
Remote Viewers Look At 9/ 11 ............................ 146
The Official 9/11 Inquiry: Another Warren Commission? ... 150

PART II - WAR FOR OIL AND DRUGS ......................... 171
The Central Asian Gas Pipeline .......................... 176
Afghan Attack Was Planned Long Ago ...................... 178
Wag The Dog In Iraq? .................................... 185
Cheney’s Dealings In Iraq ............................... 199
Iraqis And The Murrah Federal Building Bombing .......... 206
Why Did The US Military Rush Into Baghdad? .............. 213
US Complicity in The World Drug Trade ................... 218
Bin Laden, The Made-lo-Order Enemy ...................... 226
Bin Laden Replies To Bush ............................... 231
The Bin Laden Family And Friends ........................ 235

PART III - THE 9/11 BACKLASH ............................ 255
A History Of Unconstitutional Actions ................... 260
Posse Comitatus Ignored ................................. 265
A Questionable Military Record .......................... 271
Creating Homeland Security .............................. 275
Was George Orwell Right About 1984? ..................... 279
Tom Ridge And The Phoenix Program ....................... 286
Homeland Security At Work ............................... 290
Enter The Patriot Act ................................... 299
The Patriot Act At Work ................................. 305
Internment Camps In Place ............................... 315
Big Brother's Technology ................................ 321
Governing By Secrecy And Decree ......................... 329
The Shadow Government Knows ............................. 340

PART IV - HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS ......................... 345
The Reichstag Fire ...................................... 346
Pearl Harbor ............................................ 352
The Gulf War ............................................ 356
Would Americans Allow Attacks On Americans? ............. 363
War As An Economic Stimulus ............................. 369
The Mass Media .......................................... 377
A Dismal Foreign Policy Record .......................... 385
Manufactured Enemies .................................... 391
The Hegelian Dialectic .................................. 393
What Do We Know Now? .................................... 395

SOURCES ................................................. 407

APPENDIX: The Pentagon Attack Papers
Seven Hours in September: The Clock that Broke the Lie .. 439

INDEX ................................................... 467

 [Page IX]

INTRODUCTION

"Quis custodiet ipsos custodies?"

(Who will guard the guards themselves?)

- Roman poet Juvenal, Satires, VI. 347

There is a conspiracy among us, one that is poisoning our nation.
No one can doubt that the tragic attacks of 9/11 were the result of a
conspiracy, heretofore a term disparaged by the mass media when
connected to any past event in America-whether the IFK assassination,
CIA drug running, or the deaths of church members in Waco.

On September 11, 2001, widespread contempt for the word conspir-
acy was swept away in the attacks on the United States. No longer could
a major tragic event be blamed on a lone deranged individual. The ques-
tion now became who precisely was behind this conspiracy to kill Ameri-
cans, a question that the US Government has so far failed to provide an
adequate answer.

According to official pronouncements, the 9/11 conspiracy involved
19 suicidal Middle Eastern Muslim terrorists-their hearts full of hatred
for American freedom and democracy-who used small box cutters to hi
jack four airliners, crashing two into the Twin Towers of New York City's
World Trade Center and a third into the Pentagon, near Washington, D.C.

[Page X]

The fourth airliner reportedly crashed in western Pennsylvania after pas-
sengers attempted to overcome the hijackers. lo add insult to injury, this
whole incredible "Mission Impossible" operation, which defeated a $400
billion defense system, was under the direction of a devout !v9uslim cleric
from Saudi Arabia using cell phones and a portable computer in a cave
in Afghanistan.

If this conspiracy theory sounds far-fetched or just too convenient, a
closer look at the events of 9/1 1 reveals a huge number of disturbing and
unanswered questions 'This also holds true for the aftermath of the event,
in which the Bush administration used their customized 9/11 conspiracy
theory as a pretext for curtailing the cherished liberties of Americans.

As pointed out by thoughtful students of history, one must not be
distracted by the how of an event but instead should focus on the who and
the why. Accumulate the facts, though often contradictory, then concen-
trate on the overall process by which these events transpired. In other
words, consider the overview and try to think like a good police detec-
tive. Who benefited from this crime? Who had the means, the motive,
and the opportunity-not only to devise such attacks, but to circumvent
normal security measures and hinder any objective investigation?

Such reasoning brings knowledge, and it is said that knowledge is
power.

While many ardent 9/11 researchers have focused on specific and
even technical aspects of that event-the melting temperature of struc-
tural steel, the size of the Pentagon's hole, etc.-at some point one must
back off and look at a broad overview and search for deeper meanings.

The information within this book should empower Americans who
long for such a wider framework and who are ready for some straight talk
about the many factual anomalies, conflicting claims, and unanswered
questions that still surround the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001
as well as its aftermath.

Indeed, it was the provocation of the attacks of 9/11 that provided
the underlying justification for all that followed-the hurried passage of
The PATRIOT Act, increases in the defense and intelligence budgets, the
invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, the creation of the De-
partment of Homeland Security, the justifications for torture at secret
prisons, the warrantless wiretapping of Americans, the centralization of

[Page XI]

power around the Presidency, and the general stifling of dissent in a na-
tion that claims to be free.

A wider framework for understanding the post-9/11 era is also offered
by the Bush administration. It's called the "War on Terrorism," vet the
dictionary definition of terrorism is "organized intimidation," simply a
tactic of terrorists. Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, what if
President Roosevelt had declared a "War on Naval Aviation"? Yet Ameri-
cans have been warned by Vice President Dick Cheney and others that
this global war against a vague concept will last for many years, even
decades.

Knowledge of the facts about 9/11 should have been available in print
within months of the 9/11 tragedies-but it seems that freedom of the
press, at least within the 1lnited States, belongs only to those who own
the presses.

To those of us who follow the shadowy side of America's national life,
the events of 9/I1 immediately raised red flags of warning. Just one day
after 9/11, I posted my initial thoughts in a piece on the Internet. Here
are some excerpts:

WHO'S TRULY BEHIND THE ATTACK ON AMERICA? 

Many people have compared the horrendous terrorist at-
tack on New York's World Trade Center and the Pentagon in
Washington to the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. It is an apt
comparison, though not for the reasons most people think.

For true students of history, it is now beyond dispute that
certain high-ranking officials in Washington, D.C. knew in ad-
Vance of the Japanese intention to attack the US fleet in Ha-
waii, yet did nothing to prevent it.

Must the citizens of the United States wait another 50
years to learn that the 9/11 terrorist attack was allowed to
take place just like Pearl Harbor? Could such an appalling
scenario possibly be true?

Simple countermeasures against such an attack now seem
apparent. For example, if the airlines would assign just one
armed plainclothes security man to each flight, this tragedy
may have been averted since apparently the hijackers were

[Page XII]

armed only with knives or other type blades. So, how were
they able to overpower a plane load of people and, more im-
portantly, gain access to the cockpits? Who taught them to fly
jumbo jets?

As in the case of the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, the key to understanding the event lies not in who
actually committed the violence but rather who was able to
strip away the normal security protection.
Government and airline officials knew immediately that
planes had been hijacked, yet no interceptors appeared in the
air until after the attacks were completed. Who stripped away
the normal security protection of America on 9/11?

At least in this most recent case, the government cannot
blame the attack on a lone deranged individual, some Lee
Harvey McVeigh. They must deal with a full-blown conspira-
cy, even though authorities were quick to point the finger at
Osama bin Laden. Any investigation of bin Laden must look
beyond the man, to his backers and financiers.

The trail of the terrorists will most probably become murky,
with plenty of accusations for all concerned. But one thing ap-
pears quite clear, the tragic events of 9/11 play right into the
hands of persons with an agenda aimed at eroding American
liberties and sovereignty.

After decades of bloated and misused defense budgets,
there are now calls for doubling our defense allocation. In
a time of rising recognition that the CIA is an agency never
sought by the public and one which has brought so much con-
demnation on this nation, there are now cries for doubling its
size and budget. If the chief security officer for a large com-
pany fails to protect one of its most prized assets, is he more
likely to be fired or have his pay doubled?

Watch for more anti-terrorist legislation to further shred the
US Constitution.

As we all scramble to deal with the effects of terrorism, are
we in danger of losing our few remaining individual liberties?
Also, consider that we are distracted from a faltering econ-

[Page XIII]

omy (the current crisis may require more federal financial con-
trols), a plummeting public opinion of George W. Bush and
surging energy prices.

Would leaders allow a public disaster to happen with an
eye toward advancing their agendas? It's happened before...
in Nero's burning Rome, Germany's gutted Reichstag, at Pearl
Harbor and again at the Gulf of Tonkin.

While we should grieve for our losses, we must keep our
heads. When the emotions of the moment run hot, we must
remain cool and thoughtful so that we can find who is truly
behind this attack on America.

I believe the basic questions and issues I raised in this posting are as
valid today as in September, 2001.

And I didn't stop there. Within two months of 9/11, 1 had gathered a
vast amount of material, much of which appears in this book (along with
lots of new information) and presented it as a proposal to my publisher,
HarperCollins of New York, under the title, The War on Freedom.

I was told that emotions were too high and the content too "hot" for
immediate publication. Foot dragging on the book deal continued until
mid-2002. At that time, several employees of the 1:111 and CIA had come
forward to testify that they had tried to warn superiors of an impending
terrorist attack. The attitude toward my book proposal softened and 1
signed a contract to publish the book, along with a sizeable advance.

Working feverishly throughout the summer of 2002, I produced a
manuscript by my October deadline. My editor was elated with the work
and predicted it would sell more than a million copies (not to brag, but
based on sales of my earlier books, this was not at all implausible).

The wheels of major publishing grind slowly and it was not until
March of 2003 that the book received a legal review. t had already been
sent a copy of the cover and publication was just a few weeks away. The
legal review, or vetting, is a process in which legal counsel verifies the
source material and checks for anything that might cause a legal prob-
lem. This hurdle was passed and the last words from the attorney were,
"You have satisfied me."

Within two days, however, I was informed that a senior officer who

[Page XIV]

had not even read it had canceled the book. The only justification given
was that the officer "did not want to upset the families of 9/11 victims."
This was a dubious argument as by today more than 600 families have
filed lawsuits and complaints against either Saudi Arabia or senior mem-
bers of the Bush administration.

Under normal circumstances, if a book must be cancelled for legal
reasons, the author is required to return any payments made in advance.
In this case, [ was paid the remainder of the entire advance. To me, this
was an indication that the cancellation of the book was nothing less than
sheer censorship, although the identity and motivation of the censor was
not clear.

"Why would they want to prevent people from learning truths about
9/11 even if those truths were discomfiting to the public and embarrass-
ing to government authorities?" I asked myself, still believing that I lived
in a nation which valued free speech.

I proceeded to self-publish The War on Freedom, albeit with very lim-
ited distribution, and the book's reception was uniformly good despite
the small circulation. Part I of that book was later published and distrib-
uted by a small California press under the title of Inside Job. The Terror
Conspiracy expands, updates and replaces Inside job and includes the three
additional parts of the original War on Freedom, also greatly updated and
expanded in the light of events and discoveries since 2002.

As readers kept expressing astonishment at these earlier books, I real-
ized that the knowledge gleaned from a study of published matter, both
in print and on the Internet, was indeed painting a dark picture of the
persons and forces behind today's current events. I came to see that some
force existed which did not want this information available to the general
public. It would certainly upset the carefully constructed "official" expla-
nations for the horrors of 9/11.

Today is a new day. The authorized story of 9/11 has been all but dis-
credited in the eyes of an increasingly aware population, thanks to the
dedicated work of scores of journalists and researchers, the rapidly grow-
ing "9/11 truth" movement, courageous government whistleblowers and
even revelations from official inquiries.

As of this writing, we now know that:

• A wide variety of standard defense mechanisms designed to

[Page XV]

prevent such an attack systematically failed on 9/11. Espe-
cially notable are the atypical failures which occurred simul-
taneously within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
the National Military Command Center (NMCC) and the
North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD),
all charged with protecting US airspace.

• Interceptor jets were not scrambled for more than 30 min-
utes after it was obvious that four airliners had gone off
course and were presumably hijacked. In the case of Flight
77, which reportedly slammed into the Pentagon, an hour
and 45 minutes elapsed with no interception.

• Missile batteries designed to protect Washington, D.C. failed
to stop the strike on the Pentagon, one of the world's most
protected structures; and fighter jets on constant alert at An-
drews Air Force Base just 12 miles away were never scram-
bled.

• Several war game exercises, involving both the FAA and
NORAD, were being played out on the morning of Septem-
ber 11, 2001, which may have facilitated the attacks. Yet,
there has been little or no mention of these exercises by ei-
ther the major media or the 9/11 Commission.

• President Bush proceeded with a "photo op" at a Florida el-
ementary school even after he and his aides knew that three
planes had been hijacked. tie lingered in and around the
classroom for nearly 20 minutes after being informed that a
second plane had struck the World Trade Center (WTC).

• Not one steel-framed building in history has collapsed solely
due to fire. The free-fall speed collapse of the Trade Center
towers, with attendant melted steel and powdery dust, ex-
hibited all the characteristics of a controlled demolition.

• Just such a controlled demolition apparently occurred about
5 pm that same day when, according to the owner of the
WTC complex, the 47-story Building 7 was "pulled," collaps-
ing in only eight seconds into its foundation.

• Vital evidence, including the buildings' structural steel, was
destroyed through rapid removal and destruction by US

[Page XVI]

Government officials with no investigation.

• An 8-mile-long debris trail indicated that Flight 93 was de-
stroyed in the air rather than in the Pennsylvania crash re-
portedly caused by an onboard struggle between the hijack-
ers and passengers.

• More than a dozen countries tried to warn [IS authorities
that an attack on American soil was imminent, some only
days before the events.

• A growing number of whistleblowers within the federal gov-
ernment have pointed to evidence that various agencies were
well aware of the possibility of attack but were prevented
from mounting investigations by senior officials.

• In 2005, the public learned of a secret Pentagon intelligence
operation codenamed "Able Danger." The officers within this
unit had identified Mohamed Atta as a potentially danger-
ous member of al Qaeda a full year before the 9/11 attacks.

• Far from being a reaction to 9/11, the L IS invasions of Af-
ghanistan and Iraq were the culmination of longstanding
plans, which only awaited a provocation such as 9/11.

• The official explanations for the invasion of lraq, such as the
need to capture weapons of mass destruction, have proven
false while the public release of the Downing Street memo
proved that officials were well aware of the weakness of this
argument more than six months prior to hostilities in Iraq.

• Within a few hours after the 9/I1 events, the FBI released
names and photos of the suspected hijackers although later
many of those named turned up alive in the Middle East.

• Also within hours of the attacks, FBI agents were scouring
the houses, restaurants and flight schools the alleged perpe-
trators had frequented. If no one had foreknowledge of the
hijackers or their activities, how did the FBI know where to
look?

• Far from ordering a full and objective investigation to deter-
mine who was responsible for the 9/11 tragedies, the Bush
administration dragged their feet and actually took actions
to impede a swift and truthful probe into the events of that

[Page XVII]

day. It was nearly two years after the events that mounting
pressure from the public led by the families of 9/11 victims
finally forced the creation of an investigatory commission.
But this commission's final report left most of the questions
of these 9/11 families unanswered.

• No one in government has been reprimanded or even scold-
ed for what we are told was the greatest intelligence failure in
US history. In fact, the very agencies which failed the nation
watched their budgets increase dramatically.

• No person in government, except former National Security
Council counterterrorism chief Richard A. Clarke, has felt
the need to apologize to the American people for the 9/11
security failure.

• President Bush himself declined to apologize for the 9/11
tragedy to either the American public or to victim's families
during an April, 2004, press conference despite being pre-
sented with the opportunity to do so at least four times.

This is merely a short list of unanswered questions, anomalies and
puzzles concerning the 2001 attacks.

The paucity of answers to these questions coming from official sourc-
es has prompted the growth of a nationwide 9/11 truth movement that
has resulted in hundreds of websites, dozens of books and films, and
numerous citizens' inquiry conferences. More recently, a group of aca-
demics came together in early 2006 to form Scholars for 9/11 Truth. This
collection of more than 50 credentialed scholars and experts was spear-
headed by Brigham Young University physics professor Steven F. Jones,
who made headlines when he charged that the World Trade Center col-
lapsed because of "pre-positioned explosives."

"We believe that senior government officials have covered up crucial
facts about what really happened on 9/11," the group says in a statement
announcing its formation. "We believe these events may have been or
chestrated by the administration in order to manipulate the American
people into supporting policies at home and abroad."

Key members of the group include Jones, University of Minnesota Du-
luth distinguished McKnight professor of philosophy Jim Fetzer, former
director of the US "Star Wars" space defense program Robert M. Bowman

[Page XVIII]

and Texas A&M Professor Emeritus Morgan Reynolds.

Morgan Reynolds, former director of the Criminal Justice Center at
the National Center for policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, was also
the chief economist for the Labor Department during the first George
W. Bush administration. In mid-2005, Reynolds undoubtedly shocked
his former Bush associates when he publicly declared the official story
of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers "bogus" and said evi-
dence more clearly indicated that the buildings were brought down by
controlled demolition.

A collective paper by these scholars asked, "Did the Bush adminis-
tration know in advance about the impending attacks that occurred on
9/11, and allow these to happen, to provoke pre-planned wars against
Afghanistan and Iraq? 1'hese questions demand immediate answers."
They went on to declare that they were stunned to learn that the
government has brought but one indictment against an alleged perpe-
trator and, to the best of their knowledge, has not reprimanded any-
one in positions of responsibility for incompetence or dereliction of
duty. They also concluded the official conspiracy theory-that nine-
teen Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghani-
stan brought this about-is unsupportable by the evidential data.

They even indicated that there are good reasons for suspecting that
video tapes officially attributed to Osama but Laden are not genuine.
The group also found the government's own investigations of 9/11 to be
"severely flawed." For example, they pointed out that the 9/11 Commis-
sion was directed by Philip Zelikow, who had served on the National
Security Council's team for the transition between the Clinton and Bush
II administrations, and was the co-author of a book with then National
Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. A man with close ties to the White
House and a senior member of the administration's foreign policy team
could hardly be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investi-
gation. Their studies further pointed out that that The 9/11 Commission
Report is filled with omissions, distortions, and factual errors. The official
report, for example, entirely ignored the collapse of W"CC7, a 47-story
building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few
small fires, and collapsed seven hours after the attack.

In 2006, yet another former government official broke ranks by ques-

[Page XIX]

tioning the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC;7. Paul Craig Roberts
served as former Assistant of the Treasury in the Reagan administration
and was the man credited with the success of "Reaganomics."

A former Wall Street Journal editor and currently an Internet colum-
nist, Roberts wrote, "Many patriotic readers have written to me express-
ing their frustration that fact and common sense cannot gain a toehold in
a debate guided by hysteria and disinformation. Other readers write that
9/11 shields Bush from accountability. I 'hey challenge me to explain why
three World Trade Center buildings on one day collapsed into their own
footprints at free fall speed, an event outside the laws of physics except
under conditions of controlled demolition. They insist that there is no
stopping war and a police state as long as the government's story on 9/11
remains unchallenged.

"They could be right. There are not many editors eager for writers
to explore the glaring defects of The 9/11 Commission Report. One would
think that if the report could stand analysis, there would not be a taboo
against calling attention to the inadequacy of its explanations. We know
the government lied about Iraqi \V\/ID, but we believe the government
told the truth about 9/11."

Other concerned citizens went so far as to file lawsuits against the
Bush administration for complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

One was attorney Stanley C. Hilton, a Republican who had served as
chief of staff to Senator Robert Dole (R-KS), who in late 2004 filed a suit
on behalf of 400 9/11 victims' family members against top administra-
tion officials, including President Bush.

The suit charges that administration officials "all conspired with the
government of Saudi Arabia prior to 9/11/O1 to knowingly finance, en-
courage, recruit, permit, and aid and abet, certain individuals to carry
out the 9/11/O1 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, in or-
der to orchestrate a contrived, stylized and artificial second Pearl Harbor
event for the purpose of galvanizing public support for their military ad-
venture agenda in the Middle East, and in order to persuade congress to
enact their repressive patriot acts I and II for the purpose of suppressing
political dissent inside the LIS."

To newsmen, Hilton was even more to the point, stating that al Qaeda
is simply a CIA creation and that "[t]his was a government-ordered oper-

[Page XX]

ation." Citing documents in his possession, Hilton said, "[Bush] person-
ally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder."

Hilton claimed he had gained information from top military officers,
FBI agents and others who asserted that high-ranking government offi-
cials were complicit in the attacks of 9/11, which were carried out under
the cover of disaster drills and war games, code named `Tripod," under
the command of Vice President Cheney. I le said participants were bound
by official gag orders but indicated they would testify if subpoenaed.

Despite what Hilton claimed was a threat by a federal judge, he per-
sisted in prosecuting the S7 billion suit. The was dismissed in January,
2005, by US District Court of Northern California Judge Susan Illston
under an unusual ruling citing the "Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity,"
which has nothing whatsoever to do with the facts of a case but rather
the old English contention that the "sovereign [King]" is exempt from
lawsuits.

Critics of this ruling said apparently the judge reasoned that US city-
zeds do not have the right to hold a sitting President accountable for
anything, even if the charges include premeditated mass murder and pre-
meditated acts of high treason.

A California appeals court refused to hear Hilton's case and even re-
fused to allow him to file a brief outlining the case for government com-
plicity in the 9/11 attacks.

Such serious accusations coupled with the ever-growing wealth of in-
formation pertaining to 9//11 has prompted many honest people from all
across the political spectrum to conclude that the tragic attacks of 9/11
were indeed an inside job. Indeed, one professional poll in 2004 showed
that nearly 50 percent of New Yorkers believe this to be the case.

You see, one does not have to actively participate in a crime to be part
of it. The employee who knowingly unlocks the rear door to a business is
just as guilty as the burglars who loot the building later that night

This is called an inside job. It happens all the time in criminal activity.

At a minimum, 9/11 was criminal activity that officials at the highest
level allowed to happen on purpose. Far worse, the evidence in the record
provided here can lead to the conclusion that an element within the US
government actually orchestrated the 9/11 attacks.

Whatever the case, the attacks of 9/11 were without doubt some of

[Page 16]

the most monstrous crimes in history. It is my hope that this book will
motivate the American public to seek out and bring to justice the real
perpetrators behind the horrors that chilled the world on September 11,
2001, and which have led to an aftermath that is putting the future free-
dom of America in jeopardy.

Jim Marrs

The Front Cover:


The Back Cover:

This back cover is shown 1/4 size.

You can right-click on this picture, and "Save Picture As..." (it) to your own local hard drive,
to better read the text from there. Just double-click it's file name, "back_web.jpg".
You can also change the filename to whatever you want during this save process.


Order this book at: www.cafepress.com/disinfo/

Or at your local bookstore!

Spread the Word!

Thank you Jim!