Nov. 20, 2001
Return to the INE Main Page
The INE Database: Review and Status of Reported Innovative Energy Conversion Technologies, Contrasted Using A Consistent R&D Ranking Scales
P.O. Box 201
Los Altos, CA 94023-0201
A summary review and status is presented of the experiments, motors, generators, devices, and demonstrations that have been reported in the past several years to produce near-unity or over-unity operation. The concepts of free-energy, zero-point energy, and over-unity devices are not new, and many examples of such devices have been built within the last 100 years. The known devices of over 130 researchers and inventors has been catalogued in summary form in the INE Database and is presented on the internet. This database allows a listing of all of the important characteristics for any device or invention of interest to the INE. INE members and the general public can email the data regarding any new or old device of interest to this database. The database and the template file for submitting device data can be found at http://www.padrak.com/ine/DBGUIDE.html. Linked webpages exists for all of the devices sorted by name, and by the inventor's name, and separate webpages exists for each individual device. Two ranking scales have also been developed to contrast and compare all of the devices in this database: one for scientific interest, and one for commercialization interest. The results of both of these rankings are identified and summarized on separate and linked webpages. Additional input is needed for all devices of interest. The database internet files are planned to be made available to only INE members via passwords in the near future. Whether new forms of potential energy can be demonstrated and successfully utilized within the near future for the ultimate benefit of the human race remains to be seen.
"We Cannot Teach People Anything;
We Can Only Help Them Discover It Within Themselves."
- Galileo Galilei.
This paper concerns the examination and ranking of experiments, motors, generators, devices, and demonstrations that have been reported in the past several years to produce 'near-unity' or 'over-unity' operation. This means that these devices APPEAR to create more energy than they use. Actually, these are all energy conversion devices that obviously convert energy from some other energy source (or some potential energy source) into their output energy. As the 'other potential energy source' may as yet still be unidentified, these devices are not usually examined by the mainstream scientific community.
This paper follows and updates three previous papers that introduced and summarized these topics and the INE Database at previous Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conferences, first in 1993, and later in 1997. [1,2,3] These papers are also available for reference on the internet on the INE website.
These papers define 'Over-unity Devices' are those systems which appear to produce more energy than they use. In analyzing such systems, a box is drawn around the device and energy balances are formulated to measure the amounts of energy coming into and going out of that box. Whether or not the device is termed an 'over-unity' device will depend upon the size of the box. When the box is drawn large enough, all systems or devices will have a net energy transfer of zero. On the other hand, when the box is drawn just small enough, the device will seem to produce energy out of nothing, and can be said to be an 'over-unity' device - and any intelligent person or scientist will know better."
The results of this study are continually being updated, and are placed on the internet on the INE website at http://www.padrak.com/ine/. The INE Database results are located specifically at http://www.padrak.com/ine/DBGUIDE.html. 
The data in this study are continually being updated and expanded. In addition to the INE, several other organizations have recently been formed that are devoted to these same research goals, that are also contributing to this effort. [5,6,7,8]
As this work at times appears to be somewhat of a deep spiritual quest, the author has chosen to pattern the sections of this paper after the topics in the book "The Laws of the Spirit", written by a personal friend of the author. 
To Balance: "To deliberate upon by weighing opposing issues."
This requires that all of the issues be addressed and considered, especially those that may be most opposed, before deliberation, and before a deliberation can be brought into harmony.
To review or expound the points of one side of an argument is to debate one side of an issue. To not be familiar with or to not understand the points of the opposite argument is a choice - a very unwise choice. To be familiar with both sides of an issue - and to be able to debate from either side of an issue - provides the balance and clarity necessary to be able to choose the proper course of action.
We chose to examine ALL of the experiments, motors, generators, devices, and demonstrations that have been reported in the past several years to produce near-unity or over-unity operation or other advanced physics capabilities. This is an important choice, and has produced a very large list. In doing so, we chose to keep track of the theories, the claims, the data, the research, and the often conflicting viewpoints that are being reported on each device of interest. The use of computers and the internet will not make this choice difficult.
We choose to not always be entirely accurate, and we will be as accurate as we can with all of the information that is made available to us. Additional information will always be welcome.
We choose to look for the diamonds among the dirt.
We choose to have most of these devices fail in their claims. We would be content if only 1 out of 100 considered actually works.
We choose to keep accurate facts on all of the devices, even the most obvious failures, so that the information is available to others that may not have heard about these devices before.
We choose to honor all of the researchers and to honestly report all of the data that we have.
We choose to look forward to the positive results and not let the negative results interfere with or stop our forward progress.
We choose to assist in the bringing forth of the new technologies that will mark the beginning of a new paradigm of science for our use and growth.
"We Rise To Great Heights By A Winding Staircase"
- Francis Bacon.
THE DATABASE DATA
A large database spreadsheet is being used to store all of the information for each device. Each separate device is represented by one row in this database and all of the data that is made available for each device is summarized in that row. A template file on the website is used to obtain this data. The data that is currently available for each device in the database columns are listed in Table 1.
These data groups are self-explanatory.
There is no limit on the amount of text or HTML information that can be stored in any database template field.
Other columns of data will be added as necessary to provide the capability of storing all of the summary data available.
In those cases where an inventor may not want to disclose his or her real name, personal information, or even the actual name of the device, psudonames are used and arrangements are made to communicate through designated contact personnel. The purpose of this is to allow the research to proceed and to get the device information out without any fear of reprisal by the inventor or others. This is working well.
The ranking criteria are described below.
The file name entry is used by a computer code that automatically generates a HTML file website page - with all of this data - for each device in the database, and stores that file as a link in other files on the website, as listed by device name, inventor's name, and the ranking lists. 
As this information becomes more and more utilized by researchers world-wide, all the additional information received on each device will be reviewed, evaluated, and placed into the database, and all of the website files will be recreated and posted periodically onto the internet.
THE PRESENCE TO GATHER THE DATA
The data for each device are being gathered from the promoters and the critics alike. As reviewers, we do not add any bias to the information and data that is received. It is very important that all points of view on each device be made available.
Requests for this device data information have been made and will continue to be made at meetings, at conferences, by letter, by email, and on various website pages.
It is always hoped that the data received is truthful. However, experience has shown that many researchers intentionally bias their data to promote their own point-of-view. By posting all of the data received and by including the names and sources of the data, any questions and arguments about the validity of the data soon become apparent, and any open questions are usually resolved fairly quickly. Those questions not resolved will remain open until additional information and data are made available to close each open question.
THE COMPASSION TO RANK THE DEVICES
We choose to rank all the devices based upon only the information we have received and archived in order to show the status of our work and to stimulate both the promoter and the critic to provide additional information and data on each device.
By this process, we are being open to receive all information on any device, and we are remaining fair to all sides of all issues.
We are using two separate ranking systems to rank all of the devices in the database:
Ranking by Interest Criteria (Table 2), and
Ranking by Commercialization Criteria (Table 3).
Although similar in scope, these separate criteria were chosen to represent different viewpoints of the devices being studied.
RANKING BY INTEREST
The ranking by interest focuses on the status of the known data of the device and the possible interesting scientific implications that would result from the successful operation of that device.
A 13 point ranking scale index has been formed to rank the devices into six sections based on their current level of interest: listed in Table 2. This index ranks each device in sections from the 'Lowest Interest' to the 'Highest Interest', and includes a section for 'More Information Is Needed'. [http://www.padrak.com/ine/DBGUIDE.html]
The full listing of all devices ranked by these interest rankings is available at http://www.padrak.com/ine/DBGUIDE.html.
RANKING BY COMMERCIALIZATION
A similar yet separate 13 point ranking index has been formed to rank the devices into eleven sections based on their current level of commercialization: listed in Table 3. The focus of this ranking index is the ability of researchers to repeat, scale-up, or commercialize the device. This index includes devices from those that are 'Found That The Claims Are Not Correct' (i.e. they really do not work as advertised), to devices that have already passed scaled-up prototype tests, are 'Proven. Commercialization Is Now Possible', and ready for use in the world-wide market today.
The full listing of all devices ranked by these interest rankings is available at http://www.padrak.com/ine/DBGUIDE.html.
Faith For Changes And Advances
"Faith Dares The Soul To Go Farther Than It Can See."
- William Clarke.
We have faith that both the promoters and the critics will provide additional information, and will change or update their information and data based upon the input received from others. In this manner, the status of each device will be held in balance by all points of view, and an accurate representation of the capabilities of that device will emerge.
"Our Lives Are Shaped Not As Much By Our Experience, As By Our Expectations."
- George Bernard Shaw.
We expect to be successful in this project.
We expect to find out the Truth about each device.
We do not have any expectations about the capabilities or usefulness of any particular device.
And, we expect the critics to be as active in this process as the promoters, for each device.
Most importantly, we do not expect to be judged or rewarded by the number of successful devices that are eventually found. We expect to find most if not all of the devices studied to not perform up to the capabilities that the promoter may advertise. In this process, we will also find new methods and techniques that will be of benefit to existing technology.
It is important to document and list the failures. It is also important to continue to keep an open mind - especially as yesterday's failures may be re-built and/or re-adjusted, and may turn out to be tomorrow's successes.
It is important to expect that any day, one device will actually work and perform as advertised. One success will more than balance out all of the failures.
We will continue to be complete and honest in the reporting of the data that we receive.
It is hoped that both the promoters and the critics will be as honest in their documentation and submittals.
When two parties reach opposing points of view on question that does not resolve itself, then the integrity of others is called upon to provide the additional data needed to resolve the question.
It is interesting to note that most people seem to have and exhibit an open and honest truthfulness or integrity within themselves. For some, this trait seems to be learned faster than in others. Also, some people seem to never learn this trait. It is important that we continue to not allow those without integrity to get in the way or spoil the efforts of those who do have the integrity to contribute and work in these efforts.
"You Can't Cross The Sea
Merely By Staring At The Water."
- Rabindranath Tagore.
Thinking about this is not enough! We have to do something to support one another and move this effort forward!
Several organizations from all over the world are now cooperating and exchanging information in this project and related efforts!
The internet has made information transfer fast, cheap - and by way of review - accurate!
We should be willing to move forward and confront the issues, and not to stand back and be afraid to 'cause trouble', 'make waves', or 'be confrontive.' Of course we want to be confrontive! With integrity!
The only reason that you will do anything is because: YOU SAID SO!
We will accept all support and assistance that anyone wishes to provide us this important work.
REVIEWS AND CYCLES
The Truth Is Out There: Let's Find It!
A key in the integrity of this work is the ability to expect and accept additional information, conflicting reviews, and cyclic input. We expect this; we have seen this; and we need this.
For each device: "The truth is out there." For most of the devices studied, we expect 'THE TRUTH' to be somewhere in between the most positive and the most negative information.
Periodic updates of the device webpages will continue to provide the ability for additional reviews and cycles of understanding, confronting, additional data, input, and the resolution of all open questions that arise for each device.
A review of the devices in the database as ranked by the Interest and Commercialization Indexes as of October 24, 2001 is given in Tables 4 and 5. In the interest of space, only the top and most interesting sections of the ranking list are shown. The entire database results are presented and are continually updated on the INE website. 
THE US PATENT OFFICE AND 'NATIONAL SECURITY'
It is important to include here a summary observation of the review process that is made when a researcher or an inventor submits his idea or device to the official US Patent Office. In the author's opinion, our country is in a cycle whereby the needs of 'National Security' far outweigh the needs or rights of the individual, or any 'US citizen'. This is most likely due to the financial re-organization of this country in March 1933, and it's current financial situation.  From our research, we make the following observations: 
(1) All US Patent requests are first submitted to five separate review boards, each representing a separate US Military Service.
(2) If ANY of these five review boards feels that a submitted device will be of benefit to the support of the 'National Defense' or the 'National Security' of the United States Federal
(3) THAT PATENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE PATENT OFFICE REVIEW PROCESS AND WILL BE CLASSIFIED!
(4) The inventor will then be notified that his patent project has been classified, by:
(5) SECRECY ORDER (Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188): " You are hereby notified that your application as above identified has been found to contain subject matter, the unauthorized disclosure of which might be detrimental to the national security, and you are ordered in nowise to publish or disclose the invention or any material information with respect thereto, including hitherto unpublished details of the subject matter of said application, in any way to any person not cognizant of the invention prior to the date of the order, including any employee of the principals, but to keep the same secret except by written consent first obtained of the Commissioner of Patents, under the penalties of 35 U.S.C. (1952) 182, 186."
The entire Secrecy Order (Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188) is available on the internet at: http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE14.html. Read it! 
As many , if not ALL, of these devices listed in Table 4 may also be of use to the US Military in the interest of 'National Security', then the idea to file for a US Patent for ANY of these devices MAY NOT BE SUCH A GOOD IDEA!
Several successful products on the market today never applied for a US Patent; they obtained a trade-secret or a licensing agreement instead (e.g. Coca-Cola)! This may be a legal avenue to pursue instead, within the US. Several inventors, aware of these facts, have also obtained patents in other countries - FIRST - putting the information into the public domain internationally, before later applying to the to US Patent Office. This appears to have become the most successful path to insert new technology into the US.
It is also to be remembered that many aspects of the financial structure of the US Federal Government and the (so-called) Federal Reserve Bank  have also been CLASSIFIED in the interests of 'National Security', as well as have many other internal banking matters, mostly by Presidential Executive Order. As over one-half of all of the oil that is now consumed in the US is imported, any attempts to reduce the flow of imported oil into the US may be met with 'official resistance'. It seems that the problem lies not with the oil producers, who would like to conserve and replace their oil with alternate energy conversion production facilities, but rather with the oil importers! This is a very serious matter and deserves serious attention.
Surrender And Expanded Awareness
"Some Think That It Is Holding On
That Makes One Strong;
Sometimes It's Letting Go."
- Sylvia Robinson.
By letting go of some of our preconceived ideas and closely held beliefs, it is clearly seen that several of these innovative energy conversion devices are now ready and able to make a significant difference in the world TODAY! And: Other devices may not be so far behind as we think!
Let us surrender our old and limiting perspective that "nothing new is possible."
IF IT IS REALLY NEW -
OF COURSE YOU WON'T UNDERSTAND IT !
That's why it's new!
It doesn't matter if you can understand it!!!
All that matters is that it really works! -
And that it is not more dangerous to ourselves and our environment than the existing technologies it would replace.
The understanding of what it may be and how it may work will come later - as it has with all inventions and with all past advances in science and technology [http://www.padrak.com/ine/FABFACTS.html].
Let us include the expanded awareness that such 'new' devices are possible, are being advertised, may be here, and others may be ready for commercialization very soon!
Unity of Purpose
Scientific devices that have come into the world and that have been successful have one common aspect: They all required the people associated with them to have a 'Unity of Purpose' to see the device come forth from the idea stage, to the experiment stage, to the working device stage, the larger prototype stage, and finally into the commercialization stage.
Several devices that evidently were successfully demonstrated to interested researchers seemed to have died with their inventor, due to a lack of this unity of purpose. Examples include: Nikola Tesla, T. Henry Moray, Townsend Brown, Lester Hindershot, and Hans Coler. These are examples where, at the time, the greed of the industry or of the political climate was larger than the perceived benefits of each device.
Today, there are several devices that have been presented and/or demonstrated for years, and all research has stopped, only because the inventors demand a huge sum of money and refuse to work with others who will assist them. In such cases, we wonder: What is their real purpose?
Our purpose is to gather the data on all the devices possible, to review that data, allow conflict, change, and resolution, and with integrity find out and report the truth about each of these devices.
A summary review and status is presented of the experiments, motors, generators, devices, and demonstrations that have been reported in the past several years to produce near-unity or over-unity operation. A database has been formed and will be continually updated that contains a summary of all of the information we receive on each of the devices. The database information is being made available on the internet for review, constructive feedback, and closure.
All the devices in this database have been reviewed and ranked by a consistent research, development, and commercialization ranking scale. Those devices nearest to commercialization are identified and summarized.
All of the factors that are required to bring any new device into successful commercial operation have been described.
The US Patent Office and the US Federal Government may be interested in not allowing some or all of these new technologies into the public domain for 'National Security' or 'other' reasons.
Whether new forms of potential energy can be demonstrated and successfully utilized within the near future for the ultimate benefit of the human race remains to be seen.
We are all desperately looking for the next big breakthrough in modern physics to assist us in solving the escalating energy and environmental crises!
Do something to promote and encourage the continuation of these researchers and these works! If you don't do it, who will? If not now, when?
The author gratefully acknowledges all the many researchers, scientists, and skeptics that have contributed serious open research and documentation to boldly advance science and technology for the benefit of the human race.
1. Bailey, P., and Grotz, T., "A Critical review of the Available Information Regarding Claims of Zero-Point Energy, Free-Energy, and Over-Unity Experiments and Devices," 28th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), August 1993. [http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE21.html]
2. Bailey, P., Grotz, T., and Hurtak, J., "Survey And Critical Review Of Recent Innovative Energy Conversion Technologies," 32nd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), August 1997. [http://www.padrak.com/ine/BGH97_1.html]
3. Bailey, P., Grotz, T., and Hurtak, J., "Review And Status Of Reported Innovative Energy Conversion Technologies, Contrasted Using A Consistent R&D Ranking Scale," 32nd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), August 1997. [http://www.padrak.com/ine/BGH97_2.html]
4. Bailey, P., "The INE Device Database", on-going., http://www.padrak.com/ine/DBGUIDE.html.
5. Academy For Future Science, website: http://www.affs.org.
6. Alternative Energy Institute website: http://www.altenergy.org.
7. Infinite Energy Magazine, website: http://www.infinite-energy.com.
8. Integrity Research Institute, website: http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org .
9. Millman, Dan, The Laws of the Spirit, H. J. Kramer Inc., P.O. Box 1082, Tiburon, CA 94920, 1995.
10. Figgie, H. E. Jr., "Bankruptcy 1995: The Coming Collapse of America and How to Stop It," Little, Brown and Company, US and Canada, 1992.
11. MacNeill, Ken, "Insights Into The Proprietary Syndrome", Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Non-Conventional Energy Technology, pp. 125-126, Sept. 1983. [http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE14.html]
12. "Security Order (Title 35, United States Code (1952), Sections 181-188). [http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE14.html]
Table 1. Template File for INE Database Data for Any Device Device Name or Inventor Category Device Type Inventor Name Inventor Address Date First Demonstrated Watts Generated Date Last Demonstrated Watts Generated % O/U Claimed (O/U: Over-Unity) % Weight Loss Claimed Date Witnessed Witnesses Name Witness Address Date Tested Tester Name Tester Address % O/U Measured % Weight Loss Measured Researcher Contact Researcher Address Ranking, Commercialization Ranking, Interest References Last Reference Comments File Name for the INE Website
TABLE 2. INTEREST RANKING INDEX FOR TRACKING ADVANCED ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES 0 to 10, with an I and a N; as follows: MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED N - No Information. I - Incomplete: Not Enough Information. LOWEST INTEREST 0 - Not Substantiated. 1 - Evidence That The Claims Are Not Correct LOW INTEREST 2 - Being Researched By Only One Person. 3 - Something Unusual Was Demonstrated By One Person. MEDIUM INTEREST - New Physics, Small Impact; or: 4 - That Something Was Again Demonstrated By One Person. 5 - That Something Was Again Demonstrated And Witnessed By Others. HIGH INTEREST - New Physics, Large Impact; or: 6 - That Something Was Replicated By Another. 7 - The Operational Techniques And Measurements Are Being Refined. 8 - The Phenomena Is Repeatable. HIGHEST INTEREST - New Physics, Great Impact; or: 9 - The Device Seems To Be Scaleable To A Larger Size. 10 - A Larger Size Prototype Seems To Be Proven.
TABLE 3. COMMERCIALIZATION RANKING INDEX FOR TRACKING ADVANCED ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES 0 to 10, with an I and a N; as follows: N - No Information. I - Incomplete: Not Enough Information. 0 - Not Substantiated. 1 - Evidence That The Claims Are Not Correct 2 - Being Researched By Only One Person. 3 - Something Unusual Was Demonstrated By One Person. 4 - That Something Was Again Demonstrated By One Person. 5 - That Something Was Again Demonstrated And Witnessed By Others. 6 - That Something Was Replicated By Another. 7 - The Operational Techniques And Measurements Are Being Refined. 8 - The Device Works: The Phenomena Is Repeatable. 9 - The Device Can Be Scaled To A Larger Size. 10 - Proven Prototype. Commercialization Is Now Possible.
TABLE 4. INE DATABASE RESULTS AS RANKED BY INTEREST CRITERIA (October 24, 2001) HIGHEST INTEREST (10) Catalytic Hydrogen Collapse (CHC) Mills, Dr. Randall Davis Tidal Turbine Davis, Barry Electrohydrogen Generator Studennikov, V.V. Harmonic Frequency Generator Circuit Ewing, David & Walt Myers HIGHEST INTEREST ( 9) Minato Magnetic Motor Kohei Minato Moray Radient Energy Equipment Moray, T. Henry N-Machine (India) Tewari, Paramahamsa Schauberger Vortex Effects Schauberger, Viktor Sonofusion Reactor Roger Stringham Sweet Vacuum Triode Sweet, Floyd Swiss ML Converter (Switzerland) Baumann, Paul HIGH INTEREST ( 8) Bug Powered Fuel Cell Bennetto, Peter Capacitive Discharge Motor Gray, Edwin V. Capacitive Discharge Motor Ide, Osamu Cold Fusion Results Fox, Hal Finsrud Motion Machine (Norway) Finsrud, Reidar Gary's Magnetic Motor (1879) Gary, Wesley W. Hendershot Coil Device Hendershot, Lester Jefimenko Electrostatic Generators Jefimenko, Oleg Los Alamos Experimental Research Results Storms, Edmond Motional Electric Field Effect Hooper, William Noble Gas Motors (Papp Engine) Papp, Joseph Patterson Power Cell Patterson, James Podkletnov Device (Finland) Podkletnov, Eugene Pons and Fleischmann Status (France) Pons and Fleischmann Russell Optical Dynamo Generator Grotz, Toby SRI Experimental Research Results McKubre, Michael Sweet VTA Device Watson, Don T.T. Brown Devices Brown, T. T. T.T. Brown Devices Replication Deavenport, Larry Theracore Cold Fusion Thermacore Co. WIN Device Lambertson, Wingate HIGH INTEREST ( 7) High Voltage Solar Cells Sater, Bernard Kwai Motor Kawai, Teruo Orgone Energy Phenomena Reich, Willhelm [More...]
TABLE 5. INE DATABASE RESULTS AS RANKED BY COMMERCIALIZATION CRITERIA (October 24, 2001) PROVEN PROTOTYPE (10) Davis Tidal Turbine Davis, Barry Harmonic Frequency Generator Circuit Ewing, David & Walt Myers Patterson Power Cell Patterson, James CAN BE SCALED LARGER ( 9) High Voltage Solar Cells Sater, Bernard Moray Radient Energy Equipment Moray, T. Henry THE DEVICE WORKS( 8) Alcon Technologies Devices Ames, Alan Bug Powered Fuel Cell Bennetto, Peter Capacitive Discharge Motor Gray, Edwin V. Capacitive Discharge Motor Ide, Osamu Catalytic Hydrogen Collapse (CHC) Mills, Dr. Randall Cold Fusion Results Fox, Hal Finsrud Motion Machine (Norway) Finsrud, Reidar Jefimenko Electrostatic Generators Jefimenko, Oleg Motional Electric Field Effect Hooper, William N-Machine (India) Tewari, Paramahamsa N-Machine (Japan) Inomata, Shiuji Pons and Fleischmann Status (France) Pons and Fleischmann RQM Devices (Switzerland) RQM Sonofusion Reactor Roger Stringham Swiss ML Converter (Switzerland) Baumann, Paul TECHNIQUES UNDER R&D ( 7) Crystal Energy Converter Hutchinson, John Electrohydrogen Generator Studennikov, V.V. Kwai Motor Kawai, Teruo Los Alamos Experimental Research Results Storms, Edmond Noble Gas Motors (Papp Engine) Papp, Joseph Orgone Energy Phenomena Reich, Willhelm Reich Orgonne Motor Reich, Willhelm SRI Experimental Research Results McKubre, Michael Sweet Vacuum Triode Sweet, Floyd T.T. Brown Devices Brown, T. T. T.T. Brown Devices Replication Deavenport, Larry Takahashi Magnet Motor (Japan) Takahashi, Yasunori Theracore Cold Fusion Thermacore Co. [More...]